FloQast vs Numeric: An Honest 2026 Comparison
FloQast and Numeric are two of the most talked-about close management tools, but they come from different eras. FloQast is the established close and compliance platform, which says it is used by 3,500+ companies. Numeric is the newer, AI-first challenger built around flux analysis and custom reporting. We compared them on close management, reconciliations, flux, journal entries, SOX, ERP integrations, pricing and real user ratings.
- Updated October 2026
- Sources: G2 reviews and vendor documentation
- 10-minute read
FloQast vs Numeric: The Quick Verdict
Short on time? The right choice depends on whether your close is held back by process and controls, or by analysis and reporting.
Choose FloQast if you need a proven close with SOX controls
- You need SOX controls, testing and audit readiness in one place
- You run SAP, Workday, Microsoft or a mix of ERPs
- You want a vendor with a large, long-standing customer base
Choose Numeric if flux analysis and reporting are your pain
- You are a lean, technical team on NetSuite
- You want custom reports and AI-drafted flux explanations
- You want cash matching and batch journal entry posting
Look at DOKKA Close if you want a fast, ERP-native close for a mid-market team
- You run a mid-market finance team on NetSuite, SAP Business One or QuickBooks
- You want to go live in days to weeks
- You may add AP automation later for end-to-end coverage
G2 data as of October 2026. A check mark shows the stronger option for each row. Numeric's G2 scores come from far fewer reviews.
FloQast vs Numeric vs DOKKA Close: Feature Comparison
This table covers the factors that usually decide a close software purchase. We include DOKKA Close as a third option for mid-market teams.
| FloQast | Numeric | DOKKA Close | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Built for | Accounting teams that want a structured close with controls | Lean, technical teams that want AI-first flux and reporting | Mid-market teams that want a fast, ERP-native close |
| Reconciliations | Account reconciliations, automated reconciliations, AI matching incl. three-way | Automated balance sheet reconciliations, cash matching rules with AI suggestions | Automated reconciliations with AI transaction matching |
| Close task management | Close checklist, projects and AI agents | Close checklist for people and agents, review notes | AI-powered close task management and checklists |
| Journal entries | Prepare, approve and auto-post | Draft and batch-post entries to NetSuite | Automated journal entries |
| Flux analysis | AI Variance Analysis drafts explanations | Agentic flux with custom drill-downs and outside data | Flux analysis |
| Custom reporting | Close and variance reporting | Custom reports with pivots, filters and formulas | Consolidation and reporting |
| Consolidation | Not listed | Not listed | Consolidation and reporting |
| Intercompany | Not listed | Books intercompany cash transactions to NetSuite | Confirm scope for your entity setup |
| SOX and audit | Controls, testing, audit readiness, risk management | Not listed on its site | Supporting documents and audit trail |
| ERP integrations | NetSuite, SAP, Workday, Microsoft, Sage Intacct, Xero | NetSuite, QuickBooks Online, Xero, Sage Intacct | NetSuite, SAP Business One, QuickBooks and more |
| Implementation | Not published | Not published, scoped upfront | Days to weeks |
| Pricing | Custom quote, three packages | Custom quote, by volume and seats | Custom quote, mid-market pricing |
Based on vendor documentation and G2 data reviewed in October 2026. Features change often, so confirm details with each vendor.
What is FloQast?
FloQast is a close management platform founded in 2013 that says it is used by 3,500+ companies worldwide. It brings the close checklist, account reconciliations, journal entries and projects into one place, with AI agents, AI matching and AI Variance Analysis added on top.
Its Risk & Compliance suite covers SOX scoping, controls and testing, audit readiness and operational audits. FloQast integrates with NetSuite, SAP, Workday, Microsoft, Sage Intacct and Xero, and says it is SOC 2 Type II compliant and ISO 42001 certified.
Strengths
- Mature close checklist, reconciliations and journal entries
- Built-in SOX, controls and audit readiness
- Large customer base and broad ERP coverage
Limitations
- No public pricing; AI features sit in the Close AI package
- Lower G2 ease of setup score than Numeric
- Consolidation not listed on its site
What is Numeric?
Numeric is an AI-first close and reporting platform. It syncs transaction-level data from your ERP, auto-reconciles the balance sheet so reviewers only handle exceptions, and drafts flux explanations with agentic AI. Numeric says its custom reports let teams pivot, filter and add formulas without exporting to spreadsheets.
Numeric has expanded into cash management, billing and revenue, and an ERP replacement product. Its pricing page lists integrations with NetSuite, QuickBooks Online, Xero and Sage Intacct, and its published customer stories include Brex and Public.com.
Strengths
- Strong flux analysis and custom reporting
- Top G2 scores for ease of use, setup and support
- Cash matching and batch journal entry posting
Limitations
- No public pricing
- No SOX or compliance module listed on its site
- Far fewer G2 reviews than FloQast
FloQast vs Numeric Head-to-Head: 7 Categories
We scored both tools on the seven areas finance teams ask about most.
1. Close task management
Both give you a central close checklist with owners, due dates and sign-offs. FloQast has refined its checklist, projects and accounting operations over more than a decade and pairs them with AI agents that run recurring steps. Numeric’s checklist is built for people and agents working side by side, with review notes and transaction monitors. FloQast’s depth and track record give it the edge here.
2. Reconciliations and matching
FloQast offers account reconciliations, automated reconciliations and AI matching, including three-way matching, in its Close AI package. Numeric auto-reconciles the balance sheet and lets you build cash matching rules on memo, amount and date, with AI suggesting new matches over time. Both are strong, so the right pick depends on your reconciliation mix.
3. Flux analysis and reporting
Numeric puts flux and reporting at the center of its product. It offers custom reports with pivots, filters and formulas, plus agentic flux analysis that can pull in data from sources such as payroll and CRM. FloQast’s AI Variance Analysis drafts flux explanations for review inside its close workflow. Teams that want highly customized reporting will likely prefer Numeric’s approach.
4. Journal entries
FloQast’s Journal Entry Management covers preparation, approval and auto-posting to the ERP. Numeric lets teams draft and batch-post entries to NetSuite in one click, including cash and intercompany entries. Both cover the core need well.
5. SOX, controls and audit
FloQast has the broader offering here. Its Risk & Compliance suite covers SOX scoping, controls, testing, audit readiness and enterprise risk management, and it can be bought alone or with a close package. Numeric’s website does not list a dedicated compliance module as of October 2026, so teams with heavy SOX needs should ask Numeric directly how it supports them.
6. ERP integrations
FloQast lists integrations with NetSuite, SAP, Workday, Microsoft, Sage Intacct and Xero, which covers most mid-market and enterprise ERPs. Numeric is built around a deep, transaction-level NetSuite sync and also lists QuickBooks Online, Xero and Sage Intacct. If you run SAP, Workday or Microsoft, FloQast lists more options.
7. Ease of use and support
On G2, Numeric outscores FloQast on ease of use (9.6 vs 9.3), ease of setup (9.5 vs 8.9) and quality of support (10.0 vs 9.4). Keep in mind that Numeric’s scores come from about 65 reviews, compared with about 1,400 for FloQast. FloQast’s own scores are also high.
FloQast vs Numeric Pricing
Neither vendor publishes prices. Here is what is publicly known as of October 2026.
| FloQast | Numeric | DOKKA Close | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Custom quote, three packages | Custom quote, modular | Custom quote |
| Entry price | Not published | Not published | Mid-market pricing |
| What drives cost | Package (Close Management, Close AI, Risk & Compliance) and team size | Transaction volume, number of seats and modules | Scope of close automation and entities |
| Free trial | Not listed | Not listed | Demo on your own data |
Pricing changes often. Confirm current pricing with each vendor before you decide.
What Users Say: G2 Ratings Compared
Both tools are rated highly. Numeric leads every G2 category score, but from a much smaller review base. FloQast has about 20 times as many reviews, and its scores stay strong across ease of use, support and product direction.
Source: G2 comparison page, October 2026. FloQast: 1,414 reviews. Numeric: 65 reviews.
Where DOKKA Close Fits
FloQast and Numeric are both strong close tools. DOKKA Close is built for mid-market teams that want close automation sitting alongside their ERP, without a long implementation. It covers reconciliations, close tasks, journal entries, flux analysis and consolidation, and you can add DOKKA AP later for end-to-end automation.
Agentic reconciliations
Automated reconciliations with agentic AI that matches transactions and flags exceptions, so your team reviews only what needs attention.
Close tasks, entries and flux
AI-powered close checklists, automated journal entries and flux analysis, with supporting documents and a full audit trail.
ERP-native, live fast
Works with NetSuite, SAP Business One, QuickBooks and more, with consolidation and reporting. Implementation takes days to weeks.
DOKKA Close is not the right fit for very large enterprises with complex global consolidation and SOX-heavy requirements. FloQast leads on SOX and controls.
How to Choose Between FloQast and Numeric
Answer these five questions before you book demos. They will tell you more than any feature list.
FloQast vs Numeric FAQs
FloQast is an established close management and compliance platform with checklists, reconciliations, journal entries and SOX tools. Numeric is a newer, AI-first platform best known for flux analysis and custom reporting. Choose based on whether you need controls and structure or deeper analysis.
It depends on your needs. Numeric scores higher on G2 (4.8 vs 4.6 stars) and focuses on flux and reporting, but its scores come from far fewer reviews. FloQast offers SOX and controls tools, lists more ERP integrations and reports a larger customer base.
Neither publishes pricing. FloQast sells three packages (Close Management, Close AI and Risk & Compliance) on custom quotes. Numeric prices by transaction volume, seats and modules. See our FloQast pricing guide.
Numeric scores higher on G2 for ease of setup (9.5 vs 8.9). Neither vendor publishes a standard implementation timeline, so ask both for a plan based on your entities, accounts and ERP.
Yes. Both integrate with NetSuite, Sage Intacct and Xero. FloQast also lists SAP, Workday and Microsoft, and Numeric also lists QuickBooks Online.
Numeric’s website does not list a dedicated SOX or compliance module as of October 2026. FloQast’s Risk & Compliance suite covers SOX scoping, controls, testing and audit readiness. Ask Numeric directly if SOX support matters to you.
Neither vendor lists consolidation on its website as of October 2026. Teams that need consolidation often use a separate tool or a platform like DOKKA Close that includes consolidation and reporting.
For mid-market teams that want an ERP-native close live in days to weeks, DOKKA Close is a strong alternative. See our full lists of FloQast alternatives and Numeric alternatives.
Related Comparisons
Legal notice: FloQast and Numeric are trademarks of their respective owners. DOKKA is not affiliated with, sponsored by or endorsed by either company, and their names are used only to identify the products compared. This page reflects our opinion based on publicly available sources (vendor websites and G2) reviewed in October 2026. Where we say a feature is "not listed", we could not find it in the vendor's public materials; it may exist or be added later. Ratings and features change, so confirm current details with each vendor. Vendors can request a correction through our contact page and we will review it promptly.
See How DOKKA Close Compares on Your Own Data
Book a demo and we will run DOKKA Close against your real accounts and ERP, so you can compare it with FloQast and Numeric on your own data.
