Financial close automation has become a priority for teams facing pressure to deliver faster reporting, stronger controls, and clearer visibility into performance.
As companies grow, manual reconciliations, spreadsheet-driven checklists, and disconnected workflows make month-end close challenging to manage.
Numeric is a modern financial close solution built to streamline reconciliations and provide structured visibility into close progress. It offers robust collaboration and workflow management capabilities, but some companies look for deeper ERP integrations, broader automation across related processes, or more extensive compliance controls.
Whether you’re seeking stronger reconciliation, better collaboration tools, or a more scalable financial close platform, the following solutions represent the best Numeric alternatives for financial close automation.
9 Best Numeric Alternatives for Financial Close Automation
- DOKKA
- Floqast
- Onestream
- Adra by Trintech
- Blackline
- Vena
- HighRadius
- Prophix
- Workiva
1) DOKKA
Best For: Finance teams seeking AI-driven automation across close workflows and reconciliations.
Overview:
DOKKA is an AI-powered financial automation platform that streamlines reconciliations, journal validation, and document management during the close process. It reduces manual intervention by automatically matching transactions and identifying discrepancies before they create bottlenecks.
The platform integrates directly with leading ERP systems, ensuring data flows seamlessly between accounting records and reconciliation workflows. With a clean and intuitive interface, DOKKA supports operational efficiency and audit readiness.
Key Features:
- AI-driven document capture and validation
- Automated reconciliation workflows
- Real-time financial visibility dashboards
- ERP integrations
- Audit-ready documentation tracking
Why It’s a Good Alternative to Numeric:
DOKKA adds a strong layer of AI-powered automation. It minimizes manual reconciliation work rather than simply organizing it. Finance teams can reduce hands-on effort during close and achieve greater operational impact. DOKKA’s automation helps shorten close cycles while maintaining high accuracy.
Setup Process:
DOKKA provides structured onboarding, with ERP integration and reconciliation logic configuration handled early in implementation. Most teams go live within days rather than months. Dedicated support ensures user roles, workflows, and approval rules are correctly configured from the start. Fast deployment delivers immediate improvements in close efficiency.
G2 Customer Reviews:
Users often highlight time savings in reconciliations and improved visibility into discrepancies. Many reviews praise the platform’s ease of use and intuitive dashboard. Customers also value the responsiveness of the support team during onboarding. Finance leaders frequently mention improved audit readiness after implementation.
2) FloQast
Best For: Teams seeking structured close management with strong collaboration tools.
Overview:
FloQast is a close management platform designed to help accounting teams track, manage, and automate the month-end close process. It integrates directly with ERP systems and uses familiar spreadsheet-style workflows to ease adoption.
The platform centralizes task tracking, reconciliations, and documentation in a collaborative environment. Its design promotes transparency across close activities.
Key Features:
- Close task management and checklists
- Automated reconciliation tracking
- ERP and Excel integration
- Real-time close dashboards
Why It’s a Good Alternative to Numeric:
FloQast offers enhanced checklist management and team collaboration features. It helps standardize close processes across departments and ensures accountability for each task. ERP-native integrations support consistent data alignment.
Setup Process:
Implementation typically includes ERP integration and migration of existing close checklists into the system. FloQast’s onboarding team assists with mapping reconciliations and configuring user roles. Setup timelines vary but adoption is often quick due to the spreadsheet-style interface.
G2 Customer Reviews:
Users frequently report improved visibility into close progress and clearer ownership of tasks. Many mention reduced confusion and fewer missed deadlines. Some note that customization may require initial planning.
3) OneStream
Best For: Large enterprises requiring unified financial consolidation and close automation.
Overview:
OneStream is a comprehensive corporate performance management (CPM) platform that includes financial close automation alongside consolidation and reporting. It supports complex, multi-entity organizations requiring advanced data governance.
Onestream platform centralizes financial processes into a single, scalable system. Capabilities extend beyond close into forecasting and planning.
Key Features:
- Financial consolidation and reporting
- Close and reconciliation management
- Scenario planning and forecasting
- Enterprise-grade scalability
Why It’s a Good Alternative to Numeric:
OneStream offers enterprise-level capabilities including consolidation and financial planning. Large organizations benefit from its depth, scalability, and support for complex reporting and compliance requirements.
Setup Process:
Implementation is structured and can take several months due to configuration complexity. Dedicated consultants assist with system architecture and integration. Enterprises often involve internal IT teams during deployment. Once configured, the platform becomes highly customizable.
G2 Customer Reviews:
Users highlight the platform’s scalability and comprehensive capabilities. Many appreciate the unified approach to financial management. Some mention a steeper learning curve. Larger enterprises report strong long-term value.
4) Adra by Trintech
Best For: Mid-sized organizations needing structured reconciliation and close controls.
Overview:
Adra by Trintech provides automation for reconciliations, transaction matching, and close task management. It reduces manual effort in high-volume reconciliation environments.
The platform supports consistent documentation and compliance tracking. Structured workflows help enforce close discipline.
Key Features:
- Automated balance sheet reconciliations
- Close task tracking
- Journal entry workflows
- ERP integrations
Why It’s a Good Alternative to Numeric:
Adra delivers automation in transaction matching. It reduces hands-on reconciliation work through automated matching logic. Organizations managing high transaction volumes gain efficiency, and compliance features also enhance audit preparation.
Setup Process:
Setup includes integration with accounting systems and configuration of reconciliation rules. Implementation timelines vary depending on transaction complexity. Dedicated onboarding support assists with rule-building and workflow setup.
G2 Customer Reviews:
Users cite reduced manual reconciliation time and improved documentation consistency. Some note customization requires careful configuration. Overall satisfaction is strong among finance teams handling high volumes.
5) BlackLine
Best For: Enterprises seeking advanced reconciliation and financial controls.
Overview:
BlackLine is a financial close automation platform designed for large, compliance-driven organizations. It automates reconciliations, journal entries, and intercompany transactions.
BlackLine supports governance and regulatory alignment and is widely used by enterprise finance teams.
Key Features:
- Account reconciliation automation
- Transaction matching
- Journal entry management
- Compliance and audit controls
Why It’s a Good Alternative to Numeric:
BlackLine offers enterprise-scale reconciliation and compliance controls. Large organizations with strict audit requirements benefit from its structured framework and governance capabilities.
Setup Process:
Implementation typically includes structured onboarding and ERP integration. Configuration may take several months due to customization needs. Long-term scalability is a key outcome of setup. Enterprise clients often work with dedicated implementation teams.
G2 Customer Reviews:
Users highlight improved audit compliance and standardized processes. Many report increased efficiency in reconciliations. Some note initial complexity during onboarding. Reviews emphasize reliability and control.
6) Vena
Best For: Teams leveraging Excel within structured financial workflows.
Overview:
Vena combines financial close automation with Excel-driven reporting. It allows finance teams to maintain familiar spreadsheet environments while centralizing data management.
The platform enhances collaboration and version control. It bridges traditional workflows with cloud automation.
Key Features:
- Excel-based close management
- Financial reporting automation
- Workflow tracking
- ERP integration
Why It’s a Good Alternative to Numeric:
Vena supports teams that rely heavily on Excel. It enhances workflow governance without forcing dramatic process changes. Spreadsheet-centric teams may find adoption smoother while gradually modernizing their processes.
Setup Process:
Implementation includes ERP integration and migration of Excel templates. Onboarding specialists assist with workflow and permission configuration. Deployment timelines depend on reporting complexity.
G2 Customer Reviews:
Users praise flexibility and Excel integration. Many mention improved collaboration across finance teams. Some note initial configuration requires planning. Satisfaction is high among Excel-driven organizations.
7) HighRadius
Best For: Large organizations automating finance operations at scale.
Overview:
HighRadius provides automation across reconciliations, cash application, and financial reporting. AI reduces manual intervention during close. The platform supports scalability, analytics, and data-driven decision-making.
Key Features:
- AI-driven reconciliation tools
- Close task tracking
- Financial analytics
- ERP integration
Why It’s a Good Alternative to Numeric:
HighRadius provides broader financial automation across multiple workflows. AI-driven functionality supports complex finance operations and improves efficiency.
Setup Process:
Implementation includes ERP integration and configuration of automation rules. Deployment can be phased across departments. Dedicated onboarding teams guide configuration. Timelines vary depending on scope.
G2 Customer Reviews:
Users highlight efficiency gains in reconciliation and reporting. Many appreciate AI-driven insights. Some note longer implementation timelines. Enterprise clients report strong ROI.
8) Prophix
Best For: Mid-market finance teams combining close and planning workflows.
Overview:
Prophix provides financial close management alongside budgeting and forecasting tools. It centralizes reporting and workflow tracking.
The platform supports structured close management within broader financial planning and is commonly adopted by growing organizations.
Key Features:
- Close and consolidation tools
- Financial reporting automation
- Budgeting and forecasting
- ERP integration
Why It’s a Good Alternative to Numeric:
Prophix integrates financial close with planning and forecasting. It supports unified reporting and workflows, making it suitable for expanding teams.
Setup Process:
Implementation includes ERP integration and workflow configuration. Onboarding specialists assist with dashboard and report setup. Deployment timelines vary by complexity. Training supports adoption.
G2 Customer Reviews:
Users value reporting flexibility and planning integration. Many report better financial visibility. Some note customization requires initial effort. Overall reviews are positive among mid-market teams.
9) Workiva
Best For: Organizations prioritizing compliance and financial reporting accuracy.
Overview:
Workiva is a financial reporting and close platform built for regulatory compliance. It connects data across systems and supports structured reporting workflows.
Workiva is widely used for SEC reporting and audit documentation, prioritizing transparency and control.
Key Features:
- Reporting and disclosure management
- Close task tracking
- Data linking and validation
- Compliance tools
Why It’s a Good Alternative to Numeric:
Workiva provides compliance and reporting governance capabilities. Organizations requiring structured regulatory reporting benefit from its multi-stakeholder collaboration features and audit readiness support.
Setup Process:
Implementation includes data integration and workflow mapping. Enterprises may require dedicated onboarding specialists. Configuration depends on reporting complexity. Once live, the platform centralizes documentation effectively.
G2 Customer Reviews:
Users highlight compliance support and reporting accuracy. Many appreciate collaboration tools for regulatory filings. Some note the platform requires training for full utilization. Large organizations report strong long-term value.
Why DOKKA Outperforms Numeric for Financial Close Automation
Numeric helps teams organize the close. DOKKA helps teams automate it.
While Numeric provides structured visibility into reconciliations and close workflows, DOKKA goes a step further by embedding AI directly into the operational layer of the financial close.
Rather than primarily tracking tasks and reconciliation status, DOKKA actively reduces the manual work required to complete them. Automated transaction matching, discrepancy detection, and document validation remove repetitive effort from accounting teams, allowing them to focus on analysis instead of administrative follow-ups.
Another important differentiator is the depth of ERP integration. DOKKA connects directly to leading ERP systems and operates within the natural flow of accounting data. As a result, reconciliations, supporting documentation, and approvals stay closely aligned with live financial records, reducing reconciliation lag and minimizing the risk of version mismatches.
From a scalability perspective, DOKKA supports growing finance teams by combining automation, visibility, and audit readiness within a single platform. As transaction volumes increase and compliance expectations rise, the AI-driven foundation helps maintain accuracy without proportionally increasing headcount or manual oversight.
For organizations aiming to shorten close cycles, reduce manual reconciliation work, and strengthen financial controls at the same time, DOKKA stands out as the most advanced and automation-focused alternative to Numeric.
Want to see DOKKA in action? Book a free demo call to learn how it can help your finance team.
Disclaimer:
All information presented about third-party products, pricing, or features is based on publicly available sources at the time of writing and is intended for general informational purposes only. DOKKA makes no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy, completeness, or correctness of competitor data. All trademarks and brand names are the property of their respective owners.
We encourage readers to verify details with the respective vendors before making any purchasing decisions.
