Top 11 Adra by Trintech Alternatives in 2025

Efficient, automated financial close software enables companies to reduce manual errors, shorten close cycles, and maintain compliance, while providing executives with real-time insight into financial performance.

Adra by Trintech is a well-known solution in the space, offering workflow management, reconciliations, and reporting tools.

Depending on a company’s size, complexity, and system integrations, it may not always be the ideal fit. Some organizations require faster implementation, more advanced automation, or additional analytics capabilities.

To assist finance leaders in making informed choices, we’ve reviewed top alternatives to Adra in 2025. Each platform delivers unique strengths, ranging from AI-driven automation to enterprise-grade reporting and workflow management.

 

Top 11 Adra by Trintech Alternatives

 

1. DOKKA
2. FloQast
3. BlackLine
4. Vena
5. OneStream
6. Numeric
7. SolveXia
8. Planful
9. Redwood Software
10. Workiva
11. HighRadius

 

1) DOKKA

Best For: Mid-market companies and growing finance teams seeking an AI-powered platform for financial close and reconciliations.

Overview:

DOKKA automates key financial close processes, including reconciliations, journal entry validation, and document management.

AI capabilities capture and categorize financial data, flag discrepancies, and reduce manual reconciliation work.

Teams gain both speed and accuracy in closing books while maintaining audit-ready records. The cloud-based interface allows remote teams to collaborate seamlessly during the close process.

Key Features:

• AI-driven reconciliations and anomaly detection
• Automated journal entries and validation
• Centralized document management for audit purposes
• Real-time dashboards and reporting
• ERP integrations for synchronized financial data

Why It’s a Good Alternative to Adra:

While Adra excels in workflow management, DOKKA combines advanced automation with intelligent AI to reduce manual reconciliation and shorten close cycles. Its intuitive interface and fast adoption make it ideal for teams seeking high accuracy without extensive training. DOKKA also offers actionable insights that help prevent errors before they occur.

Setup Process:

Guided onboarding includes workflow setup and ERP integration. Most teams can begin automating close tasks within days, with ongoing support to optimize processes as workflows evolve.

G2 Customer Reviews:

Users love DOKKA for saving time on reconciliations and providing clear visibility into the close process. Many highlight the accuracy of its AI-driven data extraction and responsive support team.

 

2) FloQast

Best For: Mid-sized to large organizations that want collaborative financial close management.

Overview:

FloQast integrates closely with accounting systems to streamline reconciliations, task management, and reporting. A checklist-based approach allows finance teams to track progress in real time and maintain accountability throughout the close cycle.

Collaboration tools facilitate communication between accountants, controllers, and auditors, reducing bottlenecks during month-end closes.

Key Features:

• Centralized close checklists
• Task assignment and progress tracking
• Reconciliation and variance analysis
• ERP integration
• Real-time dashboards for executive oversight

Why It’s a Good Alternative to Adra:

FloQast emphasizes team collaboration and visibility, complementing or replacing Adra’s workflow-centric approach. Its checklist-driven methodology ensures accountability and helps prevent delays. Teams valuing transparency and structured close processes often find FloQast easier to adopt than Adra.

Setup Process:

FloQast onboarding includes training for finance teams. ERP integration and checklist configuration typically complete within a few weeks, with ongoing support for workflow optimization.

G2 Customer Reviews:

Users appreciate FloQast’s collaborative features and ease of tracking close progress. Many note the platform reduces bottlenecks and improves team accountability.

 

3) BlackLine

Best For: Enterprises seeking enterprise-grade automation for reconciliations and financial close.

Overview:

BlackLine provides a comprehensive suite for account reconciliations, task management, journal entries, and intercompany accounting.

Automation and reporting capabilities allow large organizations to scale financial close operations efficiently. Configurable workflows enable organizations to enforce compliance and standardize close procedures across multiple business units.

Key Features:

• Automated reconciliations and journal entries
• Task and workflow management
• Intercompany transaction automation
• Advanced reporting and analytics
• ERP integrations for seamless data synchronization

Why It’s a Good Alternative to Adra:

BlackLine excels in large-scale automation and enterprise compliance, whereas Adra focuses on workflow management. Finance teams handling high transaction volumes or complex reconciliations may find BlackLine more suitable. Its advanced reporting also provides executives with deeper insights into financial performance.

Setup Process:

Structured onboarding includes ERP integration, workflow mapping, and testing. Larger deployments may take several weeks, with professional support ensuring smooth implementation.

G2 Customer Reviews:

Users highlight BlackLine’s ability to manage large transaction volumes and streamline complex reconciliations. Many also note improved audit readiness and process transparency.

 

4) Vena

Best For: Companies seeking integrated financial planning and close management in one platform.

Overview:

Vena combines financial planning, forecasting, and close management, providing a single source of truth for accounting and FP&A teams.

The platform leverages Excel interfaces while offering automation and workflow capabilities.

Integration ensures planning, reporting, and reconciliations remain synchronized, reducing errors and increasing efficiency. Collaboration tools support distributed finance teams in maintaining accuracy across departments.

Key Features:

• Financial close and consolidation
• Budgeting, planning, and forecasting
• Workflow automation and approvals
• Real-time dashboards and reporting
• Integration with ERPs and other financial systems

Why It’s a Good Alternative to Adra:

Vena goes beyond reconciliations by integrating financial planning and reporting, offering a more strategic perspective. While Adra focuses primarily on close workflow, Vena allows teams to perform planning, reporting, and close tasks in a single environment.

Setup Process:

Guided onboarding includes templates for budgeting, reconciliation, and reporting. Teams receive training to leverage automation and Excel-based flexibility effectively.

G2 Customer Reviews:

Users appreciate Vena’s combination of planning and close management. Many report fewer reconciliation errors and faster reporting cycles.

 

5) OneStream

Best For: Large enterprises needing unified corporate performance management and financial close.

Overview:

OneStream provides a corporate performance management (CPM) platform that consolidates reporting, planning, and financial close.

Multi-entity organizations can unify finance processes, maintain compliance, and deliver actionable insights. OneStream’s extensibility allows businesses to scale and customize reporting frameworks, giving executives accurate insights across divisions.

Key Features:

• Financial consolidation and close
• Strategic planning and forecasting
• Workflow automation and task management
• Multi-entity reporting and compliance support
• ERP and system integration

Why It’s a Good Alternative to Adra:

OneStream focuses on enterprise-wide consolidation and reporting, whereas Adra emphasizes workflow management. Companies with complex entity structures or regulatory requirements benefit from OneStream’s comprehensive CPM capabilities.

Setup Process:

Implementation includes workflow design, data mapping, and system integration. Professional services support efficient deployment for large organizations.

G2 Customer Reviews:

Users highlight the platform’s ability to unify reporting and simplify consolidation. Many note significant improvements in accuracy and visibility across entities.

 

6) Numeric

Best For: Finance teams seeking AI-assisted reconciliation and reporting automation.

Overview:

Numeric delivers AI-powered automation for reconciliations, financial reporting, and anomaly detection.

Machine learning algorithms identify discrepancies and accelerate the close process. Teams can quickly review exceptions, improving accuracy and reducing end-of-period stress.

Key Features:

• AI-driven reconciliation
• Automated journal entries
• Anomaly detection and alerts
• Financial reporting and dashboards
• ERP integration

Why It’s a Good Alternative to Adra:

Numeric provides intelligent automation to reduce manual reconciliation work, while Adra emphasizes workflow management. Teams seeking data-driven insights and early anomaly detection may find Numeric more efficient.

Setup Process:

Onboarding support includes ERP integration, AI configuration, and workflow setup. Most teams see benefits within the first month.

G2 Customer Reviews:

Users like Numeric for automating repetitive tasks and accelerating financial close. Many appreciate AI-driven insights for identifying errors before they propagate.

 

7) SolveXia

Best For: Teams needing flexible, low-code automation for finance processes.

Overview:

SolveXia offers a no-code/low-code platform for automating reconciliations, reporting, and other repetitive finance tasks. Its flexibility allows teams to build custom automation without heavy IT involvement.

SolveXia supports data integration from multiple sources, reducing reliance on spreadsheets.

Key Features:

• Workflow automation for finance tasks
• Low-code/no-code automation tools
• Reconciliation and reporting support
• Data integration from multiple sources
• Customizable dashboards and alerts

Why It’s a Good Alternative to Adra:

SolveXia enables tailored automation beyond Adra’s standard workflows. Teams requiring highly customized processes or non-standard reconciliation logic may find SolveXia more adaptable.

Setup Process:

Onboarding includes template libraries for common finance processes. Users can configure workflows independently, with optional support for complex scenarios.

G2 Customer Reviews:

Users value the platform’s flexibility and low-code approach. Many report significant reductions in manual effort, allowing finance teams to focus on higher-value tasks.

 

8) Planful

Best For: Mid-market to large companies seeking cloud-based financial planning and close management.

Overview:

Planful provides cloud-based financial consolidation, reporting, and workflow management.

The platform supports operational and strategic finance tasks, helping teams shorten close cycles while managing budgeting and forecasting. Real-time dashboards and KPIs give executives actionable insights into financial performance.

Key Features:

• Financial consolidation and reporting
• Close cycle workflow management
• Budgeting, forecasting, and planning
• Dashboards and KPIs
• ERP integration

Why It’s a Good Alternative to Adra:

Planful combines financial planning with close management, delivering strategic insights alongside operational efficiency. Unlike Adra, which focuses primarily on task tracking and workflow, Planful provides a holistic approach connecting reporting, planning, and close processes.

Setup Process:

Guided onboarding includes workflow setup, consolidation mapping, and reporting configuration. Users typically experience faster close cycles and improved planning accuracy after implementation.

G2 Customer Reviews:

Users highlight improved reporting, reduced close times, and the ability to manage multiple finance functions in a single platform. Many value the cloud-based interface for remote team collaboration.

 

9) Redwood Software

Best For: Enterprises seeking robotic process automation (RPA) for finance and accounting tasks.

Overview:

Redwood Software uses RPA to automate repetitive finance processes, including reconciliations, journal entries, and reporting.

Automation spans multiple systems, reducing manual work and increasing consistency across finance operations. Monitoring tools ensure processes run smoothly without human intervention.

Key Features:

• Robotic process automation for finance tasks
• Workflow orchestration
• Cross-system integration
• Automated reconciliations and reporting
• Monitoring and alerting

Why It’s a Good Alternative to Adra:

Redwood automates processes at a systems level, while Adra focuses on workflow and task tracking. Organizations seeking to reduce manual touchpoints across multiple platforms may find Redwood’s RPA capabilities highly valuable.

Setup Process:

Implementation includes RPA workflow configuration and system integration. Professional services ensure automation is properly tested and deployed.

G2 Customer Reviews:

Users highlight reduced manual workload and improved process consistency. Many also note the platform’s ability to connect disparate systems without heavy IT involvement.

 

10) Workiva

Best For: Organizations needing integrated reporting, compliance, and financial close solutions.

Overview:

Workiva centralizes financial data and regulatory reporting while supporting close management processes.

The platform enables collaboration across teams, ensuring data consistency and compliance with audit and regulatory requirements. Real-time dashboards and alerts help finance teams quickly address discrepancies.

Key Features:

• Integrated financial and regulatory reporting
• Close management workflow
• Compliance and audit support
• Real-time dashboards and collaboration
• Data integration across systems

Why It’s a Good Alternative to Adra:

Workiva emphasizes auditability and regulatory compliance alongside close management. Adra focuses on workflow, while Workiva provides broader reporting and compliance capabilities for highly regulated organizations.

Setup Process:

Onboarding includes workflow configuration, reporting templates, and compliance setup. Teams often see improvements in reporting speed, accuracy, and audit readiness.

G2 Customer Reviews:

Users praise the platform’s reporting and collaboration capabilities. Many report significant time savings in preparing reports and maintaining audit trails.

 

11) HighRadius

Best For: Enterprises looking for AI-driven finance and accounting automation across multiple processes.

Overview:

HighRadius delivers AI-powered automation for reconciliations, cash application, and financial close. It accelerates cycle times and reduces manual work by intelligently processing transactions and identifying anomalies.

Predictive insights help finance teams prevent errors before they impact reporting.

Key Features:

• AI-driven reconciliation and cash application
• Financial close workflow automation
• ERP integrations
• Predictive analytics for anomalies and exceptions
• Reporting and dashboards

Why It’s a Good Alternative to Adra:

HighRadius uses AI to optimize multiple finance processes, whereas Adra emphasizes workflow management. Teams seeking predictive insights and broader automation across the finance cycle may find HighRadius more impactful.

Setup Process:

Guided onboarding includes AI configuration and ERP integration support. Teams often achieve measurable reductions in manual effort and faster close cycles.

G2 Customer Reviews:

Users report faster reconciliations, improved accuracy, and time savings across multiple finance processes. Many appreciate predictive insights that help prevent errors.

 

Why DOKKA Stands Out Among Adra by Trintech Alternatives

 

DOKKA is a comprehensive financial close automation solution for mid-market finance teams. Unlike Adra, which primarily focuses on workflow management, DOKKA automates the entire financial close cycle, including reconciliations, journal entries, and document management.

AI-driven technology ensures highly accurate data capture and anomaly detection, while seamless ERP integrations enable smooth implementation without disruption.

Finance teams gain faster closes, reduced manual effort, and real-time visibility into key metrics.

Collaboration across distributed teams is fully supported, making DOKKA ideal for remote or multi-location finance departments.

Whether your company is scaling rapidly or managing complex multi-entity workflows, DOKKA provides the automation, flexibility, and insights needed to modernize financial close operations.

Discover how DOKKA can simplify your financial close processes by scheduling a free demo today.

 

Disclaimer:
All information presented about third-party products, pricing, or features is based on publicly available sources at the time of writing and is intended for general informational purposes only. DOKKA makes no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy, completeness, or correctness of competitor data. All trademarks and brand names are the property of their respective owners.
We encourage readers to verify details with the respective vendors before making any purchasing decisions.